Feed on
Posts
Comments

As discussed earlier, the Cumberland Gap Genealogy Jamboree will be held this coming weekend, June 9-12, 2011. The schedule, speakers and other data are noted on the website at http://www.wil-syl.com/jamboree3/.

Cumberland Gap was founded in 1750 by Dr. Thomas Walker, an early Virginia physician and explorer. Nature created the site much earlier when a meteorite created the Middlesboro crater in the Cumberland Mountains, which are part of the lower Allegheny Mountains. Without the crater, it would have been difficult for packhorses to cross the mountains. The Gap is part of the famous Wilderness Road.

Initially there was an Indian path through the Gap. Daniel Boone and some loggers widened it for wagons and groups of settlers.

In early 1775 there were perhaps 150 single men and Indians in Kentucky. In August 1775, Daniel Boone and Hugh McGary – along with Thomas Denton and Richard Hogan were the first to bring their families through the Gap. Between 1775 and 1810 some 2-300,000 people went west along this route.

Hope to see you there.

Share

My genealogy software has a Match and Merge function, as do some competitive  programs. This function performs nunerous processes, but normally permits one to take a GEDCOM from another researcher and merge that data into your own, at the same time identifying possible matches so that duplicates are not created. The following comments do not fully explain the Match and Merge function since they differ between each software version, rather, the comments address some cautions about the process.

I merged two databases only once, about six months after I started researching my family. I found a lady with the maiden surname I carry. Her husband had my mother’s maiden name. I excitedly added 1,100 names to my data using a GEDCOM  only to determine much later that the husband was not a relative. Bad mistake!!

So I had some good data and some useless data. But that was only the beginning of the problems I had created.

Since my professional background was as a Management Consultant, shortly after starting research I laid down some characteristics I wished to be consistent within my data. Just as my clients wished a standard product modified to their company, I wished the same thing for my project.

Here is a partial list of my “Standards” for data:

  • All birth, death, marriage and burial location data will include a county;
  • All birth, death, marriage, etc data will have no abbreviations except Cty;
  • Notes will be arranged in chronological sequence;
  • Paragraphs will not have indents but line up to the left edge;
  • Book titles will be italicized, not underlined;
  • Legal document writings will be italicized;
  • Proper grammar and sentence construction should be used.                                                                                                             .

There are a few more but they all come under the heading of “consistent …… and readable”

It would be a miracle if another person used my “standards”, so I have always entered by hand data coming from another database, except for the 1,100 of long ago. If the Notes were consistent with mine, I would Copy/Paste.

While there are certainly accidental exceptions to “my standards”, generally my Register Reports provide a standard look and feel when printed and ultimately combined into books.

Share

The following article is from Eastman’s Online Genealogy Newsletter and is copyright by Richard W. Eastman. It is re-published here with the permission of the author. Information about the newsletter is available at http://www.eogn.com.

Today I read an online message from a reader of this newsletter in which she bemoaned the quality of genealogy information found on the Internet. She went on at some length to say that the information found online is full of inaccuracies, is posted by people who don’t know what they are doing, and that “genealogy information found on the Internet should never be trusted.”

I was sympathetic to what she wrote until that last part. NEVER be trusted?

I will be the first to agree that there is a lot of inaccurate SECONDARY information on the Internet. But let’s not overlook the fact that the Internet also brings us images of ORIGINAL source records as well.

Want to see the record of your great-great-grandparents in the U.S. Census? Click with your mouse and look at the IMAGE of the original entry without leaving your home. Want to see a naturalization record? IMAGES of many of them are available online. Would you like to see granddad’s World War I Draft registration form that lists information about parents? The IMAGE of the original document is available online. Want to see an obituary? Several online services provide IMAGES of the newspaper obituaries. And how about the Southern Claims records, many of which were never available before on microfilm? IMAGES of each record are now available online.

Yes, the Internet certainly is a mix of good and bad news, but let’s not condemn everything. Looking at images of original source records on the Internet makes us better genealogists than those of us who used to be limited only to transcribed (secondary) sources. We have much more information available today than ever before. Some of it is good information, such as IMAGES of original records. Other information found online is questionable, such as secondary information contributed by someone else. Let’s not condemn everything simply because some of it is bad.

We do have an education problem. We need to educate newcomers as to what information is immediately believable versus what information requires independent verification. This education process must be active on all genealogy sites, including this one, and must continue forever as new genealogists join us. However, I will suggest that this requirement for education should not stop us from looking at images of original records.

There is an old saying that pops to mind, something having to do with babies and bathwater.

Looking forward ten or twenty years, I suspect that eventually all of us will focus primarily on images of original records, as found on the Internet. As millions and millions of additional images come online, the references we all enjoy will continue to improve. I see that as a great advance in genealogy scholarship.

Share

Have you ever been to the Cumberland Gap, walked a bit of the Wilderness Trail? There is an incredible amount of history to be discovered at the Gap. As you would know, it was the gateway to the West, long before St. Louis erected the Arch and called it the gateway to the West.

There is a National Park nearby. Our National Parks and those who staff them are  true treasures. In fact one of them in the Vicksburg Memorial Park got me started into genealogy and I am forever grateful to that Ranger.

There will be a National Jamboree at the Cumberland Gap on June 9, 10, 11 and 12 in 2011. If you go to http://www.wil-syl.com/jamboree3/ you can learn all you need to know.

I’ll see you there.

Share

I have written before about the value of adding pertinent history surrounding or on the date of particular events in the lives of our ancestors. I believe it makes reading our family histories more interesting and sometimes helps to explain their reactions or actions to those events.

Earlier in December 2009 I copied from my father’s biography or Notes a description of the The Mexican Punitive Expedition of 1916-1917 because he had participated in that event.

I also added the following  taken from the local newspaper of the day: By means of the wonderful long distance telephone, people in Madisonville can now talk with people at Hopkinsville, Nashville, Henderson, Evansville and intermediate points, and the conversation can be as distinctly understood as if the persons conversing were within a few feet of one another. The route will be extended to Louisville in the spring. I added, “his birthday was thus celebrated.”

Since Google can tell you almost anything you want to know, today for the first time I asked what happened on his birthday, and this resulted in my adding:

“His birthday failed to forecast the future, however, as on that day The United States Supreme Court declared income tax to be unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co.”

Historical and interesting, would you not agree?

Share

I write all of my family history books using Register Reports. These reports were developed long ago by the New England Historic and Genealogical Society (NEHGS). They have been proven time and again as the clearest method of communicating from whom and how one descends.

But there are other items I include in my family histories and I will mention a few. Not all items discussed are used in every book, but a certain amount of decision making occurs in an attempt to make the book both informative and interesting.

I have identified some 52 grandfathers. A book is comprised of the highest level (generation) of a group which are related and descends until it reaches my own surname of Bourland. Thus I generally do not repeat data in any book appearing in another. A book can thus contain several (perhaps 5 to 7) surnames or at times 25 surnames.

The first section of a book is often a diagram of the families in the form of a Descendants Chart or Fan Diagram. If the descent is more complicated I will draw a diagram using colors to illustrate the descent of a surname until it changes by marriage, at which point the color changes. This helps the reader visualize the interrelationships more easily. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.

A Table of Contents is appropriate and since all of my books end up in PDF form, tabs can be made for additional inclusions such as maps, a bibliography, and other somewhat extraneous items which nonetheless are related and interesting.

Next can come a history of the town or area from which a family originated. My father’s family remained in one Kentucky town for 200 years, so its history was significant. Here might be discussed the town’s formation, the industries and certain historical events and people.

In one case my relatives helped settle one town and as it enlarged settled several other nearby towns and in turn married into other surnames. Each of those towns might be discussed in terms of their history. In other cases research may have identified a particular section of the country from which we immigrated, and or the ship used to transport us may be known and described.

Because some families remained where they were, others moved one or more states and some were clearly westward bound, there may be a discussion included of how multiple families impacted numerous states. While such a discussion could be included in a Note of each person in every Register, the impact can be greater if moved to the front of the book.

Historical acts are sometimes included. For example when Thomas Hooker left Massachusetts and went to Hartford (where I lived for 35 years) I included a description of that trip over the ‘Connecticut Path’ used previously by Indians and now is generally U.S. Route 84.

Last to be mentioned might best be described with a what and why. In one book I included a rather long description of the War of 1812. Few know today much about that war and yet many of my ancestors were impacted by it. So I included a chapter in one particular book.

Any document such as a Register Report in Word can be saved as a PDF. There is software available which allow you to add a page or pages of PDFs to each other. Therefore, you can add diagrams, Tables of Contents and other writings to what is the essence of your effort represented by the Register Reports.

Hopefully the above will offer some suggestions of use to you as you create the legacy you hope to leave behind from your research.

Share

Here are some comments I copied from certain genealogy-related sites, where the blanks refer to genealogy software:

“I had my sister-in-law excited about getting ___, but when she discovered that ______ doesn’t interface with NFS (New Family Search) it was a deal breaker. Now I jealously watch her as she easily transfers information to and from her genealogy program to NFS.”
“I’m all for adding Internet connectivity to _______. Of course, FamilySearch is not the only site online that offers online connectivity. At least two other major sites offer public APIs for connecting to their data …….”.
What these two, as many others, are asking for is the ability to download from the Internet directly into their genealogical database.
I believe this to be inherently wrong-headed. Here’s why:
  • • Most data on the Internet has no Source attributions nor notations;
  • • Much on the Internet is factually incorrect;
  • • Most people have their own style of writing which is not your style;
  • • Many people do not include data such as county, middle names, nicknames, etc;
  • • Downloading data upon data will not place that data in chronological sequence.
There are two major points I would make as a result.
First. If your work is to be your legacy, it should be in your style, not in the style of various people. Therefore, either copy the found data or dump your findings into a separate database, print it out and rewrite/retype in your style and in chronological order.
Second. Accuracy in genealogy is more important than a court of law. Just think, if you conclude you are related to George Washington based on inaccurate data, your descendants will believe and perpetuate that myth until someone remarks, “You’re crazy”. Not a nice legacy to leave.


Share

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »